But everything else besides the answers was right.

The equation is an answer. The numbers were typoed in the calculator. Why try to spin it in a negative light as something other than it was.

It could have been off due to a typo or it could have been off due to a brain annuerism. It was off.

Disingenuous. If the equation is correct, and you didn't even check the equation, then you have no grounds to be doing peer review. You would instead note that there is a typo in the numbers that were input into the equation and not false accuse that the underlying math of the equation is incorrect.

It is the equation that matters. The equation determines whether the mathematical concept of Part 1 was incorrect. The final numbers are superfluous. That is why we are required to show our derivations on math exams.

Please I think you know what peer review is and how it is done.