You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Downvote Pool Deep Dive

in #steem6 years ago

I've seen this discussion in the past, allowing stakeholders to lock up their SP in a non-voting state, receive interest similar to bid bot roi but letting those who want to curate and think they can curate better for more rewards do it. It's an okay idea but if any of the recently discussed changes were to come into effect I believe delegating to curation projects or bots that return you the majority if not all of your delegation's curation rewards will be in more favor, not to mention you'll be able to use the downvotes as well.

Maybe not calling them "stinc" would help get their attention to your questions, though.

Sorry if you're disappointed by a non steemit member replying.

Sort:  

'curation projects' like yours ?
You are as bad for steem as bid-bots are.

A lot of problems and leeches here would disappear, if stakeholders were not economically forced to vote.

I will keep calling them 'stinc', after they let this linear rewards mess just sit for 2 years and let a host of bad players stake up heaps.

You're funny, but also weird.