You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: This has been a demonstration of optimal posting strategy under Hardfork 20.

in #steem • 7 years ago

On reading the initial detail of the voting window/curation rewards change 6 months or so ago, this was not how I understood it. (And thought the rewards would be put into the pool of the actual post being curated).

I'm hoping the pool is bigger for all, but it sounds like big votes (bot votes) could potentially scoop up most of the 'extra' rewards. Not ideal if so :/

As always, more reading required - tag me in if you spot something Dave, cheers!

7 years ago in #steem by
$0.00
    1 vote
    Reply 2
    Sort:  
  • Trending
    • [-]
     7 years ago  


    Sent with Fast-Reply
    @abh12345 I look forward to you learning more about it... If it was how you read it the first time, I would say nothing...I frankly don't care who gets the money from the post (author or curator)...But taking money away from a post just to add it back to the pool, just adds another layer of absurdity that we will have to adjust to...And the optics are horrible.

    $0.03
    • Past Payouts $0.03
    • - Author $0.02
    • - Curators $0.01
    1 vote
    Reply
    [-]
     7 years ago  

    It will be interesting to see how it pans out, and I'm hopeful it's not as bad as folks suspect. STEEM at 1.7 right now, about time we had a lift!

    $0.00
      Reply