Interesting article. Thank you.
But if we assume that accounts that were made on 1970 are not "real" ones, shouldn't we treat 1,000,003th user as the real 1,000,000th user?
Interesting article. Thank you.
But if we assume that accounts that were made on 1970 are not "real" ones, shouldn't we treat 1,000,003th user as the real 1,000,000th user?
Wow, very interesting point! I've updated it. Thanks!