You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Amend Miniset Proposal

in #spsproposal13 hours ago

First impression, I'm very confused.

First point says RF only, that later talks about a modifier for BF and GF.

Seems to me like it's rather over elaborate, just addressing the BF issue and the wagon repair cost would have sufficed imo.

I have not gotten the sense that anyone really had an issue with any other aspect of this round of conflicts other than the pain points I mentioned above

Sort:  

Its elaborate because there are a lot of issues to be addressed. One thing affects another and while you didn't have issues with certain parts, other people would have an issue with change. So there had to be compromises to solve the issues as best as possible. While it would've been great if we could've had people happy with a less complicated set of solutions, that's easier said than done.

I do understand the difficulty. Thanks for the feedback.

I'm still confused by the BF/GF/RF bit though. Will the CS reduction only affect the main set wagons going forward and the Mini-Set wagons will not allow BF/GF ?

All the foils are still being made, they will just be given out differently. The RF will come via the main conflict, with the GF/BF/ and arcanes coming via the Foil Draws after the main conflict is over. And all the foils from the mini-set will be able to be staked on Mini-Set Wagons.

The Conflict Score reduction will not apply to the Conclave Arcana wagons, and we will see how this goes for the mini-set to see what impact there will be for the next full set of conflicts. Therefore, the Conflict Score for now is only applicable to the Mini-Set conflict only.

Cheers !