You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: DAO Proposal: Revamp Splinterlands Affiliate Program

in #spsproposal9 months ago

I agree that the affiliate program is very bad but I don't agree with these solutions. I think it's difficult to balance the % on the secondary market stuff. We simply can't had extra fees on top of those 6%. 5% wasn't good and it was increased to 6% which I was very against. But reducing the burn fee is also not good.

I also don't understand the rshares part. What does that give? Glint? SPS? Both? I'm against any of the options. More SPS would mean a smaller pool for everyone else. More Glint would mean that some players with a lot of affiliates could earn Glint very fast, breaking the system. It could also be very easy to exploit by bot farms. Have 1000s of accounts in wild feeding one main account that would get a lot of Glint this way and buy 1 of each title as soon a new one shows up and a lot of chests, energy and anything that is worth it.