Im really not liking the fact the DAO cannot weigh in on price and edition size here. Voting no until that is changed.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Im really not liking the fact the DAO cannot weigh in on price and edition size here. Voting no until that is changed.
That's reasonable. I would have ideally liked the DAO to be the ones making those decisions, but considering the urgency and timing that just wasn't going to be possible in this case.
I understand it's not the perfect scenario for the DAO, but this is likely the only opportunity the DAO will have for something like this probably until the next major set comes out. So the question is - is it better to take this opportunity despite not liking a few things, or turn it down because it's not perfect?
I just feel if you are soliciting the DAO for money that we should be treated with equal respect as you would any other investor. I wouldn't give someone money if they didn't tell me how much product they were going to sell or for how much. That is extremely reckless. Anyway this is going to pass despite my dissent, but I feel someone had tho raise this issue.
Actually, investors in startup companies don't usually get into that level of detail. Typically they invest because they believe in the vision and in the leadership team / founders to execute on it. So I don't see this being in any way disrespectful or reckless.
That being said, I do expect that the full details of what we're planning for the Rebellion sale will be announced before this proposal has completed the formal voting phase, so everyone should have a chance to review that before the vote is finalized.