I don’t agree with removing different pack types. If players want to pay a premium for a higher chance of bf cards they should be able to.
Players not understanding what they are buying is not a good enough reason for removing an incentive for other players to chase bf cards
I genuinely don’t understand the rest of it.
That's fine that you don't agree FM. In the last set of conflicts there was quite a bit of negativity regarding the formulas for the pack inclusion of the Black Foils. Since things changed again, quite a bit on this mini-set, then it was an issue that some didn't want to repeat and make the same mistake again given 1) its a new dynamic and 2) our community has quite a few people that care about disparity.
If you feel that having 3 pack types is more important than having Conflicts, then certainly you can vote against it. You can also make a proposal to have the 3 pack types too if this proposal were to pass.
I like that you identified what is your most important issue, that makes it easier to comment on. Your focus is on the pack types, so either 1) the proposal fails and you don't need to do anything - no conflicts but 3 pack types or 2) the proposal passes and you can find support to do the 3 pack types and put up a subsequent proposal.
As with everything in this proposal, there are many parts to it for a reason. Getting people to agree on solutions was not easy. So while everyone might want various pieces to be different, in my opinion the totality of the proposal is good even though everyone will have pieces they like and dislike. That's just my thoughts, of course everyone is encouraged to have their own!
I, for one, loved multiple pack types, and conflicts kind of suck. So I guess it is not a guess that I hope this fails.
I too like multiple pack types, and I was a big proponent of them on the main set. And like I said above, its cool that you don't want this to pass, especially more so if you don't like conflicts.