Again this is a catch 22, how do you decide who will be part of that comity and how can you enforce to make sure anyone in charge to decide what is bot and what's not don't get bribe or use and protect their own bot, collusion or Ban hammer abuse by those with this power etc.

I'm not a big fan of bot but I agree with Matt original vision that is to try and build the game itself in a way to keep it decentralized and where both bots and human player can be part of the same ecosystem and trying to find a balanced way without having to police the game all the time which cost money and time and that will pissed off over what looks like 80% of the players out there that looks like they have both main account and dozens of bots to generate more value for themself.

I still think we should try to focus on finding ways to reduce exploiting overall and find ways that whether you are a human or bot account, the fact that you play our game = you generate and bring to the game as much value as you can take out to avoid having only leeches bots.

Right now, Player Staking SPS to earn reward and soulbound cards are already a good step in that right direction without the need for this bots crusade IMO.

And really, the entire "ban bots" rhetoric is always about bots = bad but without any constructive solution to solve the real problem suggested to back that.

Personally I will vote against that proposal until someone can come up with a fully detailed way how to get rid of bot that make sense and that is not hurting the economy itself like cards rental or affecting the time it takes between battles if you get rid of the 3/4 of the current account that are not players.

I'll gladly vote in favor when someone can come with a detailed solution plan that hold the road but until then, that's a no for me.