Generally, we shouldn't ask for additional money for a product that is already sold. This goes against the value and integrity of what Splinterlands stands for. Downvoted to express my opinion.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Generally, we shouldn't ask for additional money for a product that is already sold. This goes against the value and integrity of what Splinterlands stands for. Downvoted to express my opinion.
Surprisingly I am with you this time, 100% in agreement
You see Uwe, that is the way life should work. We don't have to agree on everything, as long as we agree on something. My heart is in the right place, no matter what you imagine :)
Cheers!
Yes man - i always been sure your heart is in the right place, however might disagree on things within this game and in general on Hive - but what united us is we both want these things to succeed as a whole.
This time I have to agree with you. Land was sold ages ago, without the mention that it shall have another money sink coming in.
this is the way a healthy debate should work. There will be issues we will agree and there will be others when we won't.
You are a good guy @azircon, even we had disputes for a long time. Let's make SPL great again :-)
I like that you care about my investments and that you draw me a plan for my money.
How much land do you have? If you don't own a single plot, I would suggest stopping dealing with this topic, as it does not concern you.
Well, I'm always in for a debate. If you have that amount of skin in the game, I have to go with you about it. For the sake of privacy, delete or edit your name out of the comment. I care about it a lot.
Regarding the assets in SPL, s mall disclosure, I have above 5.5 mil collection power and a tract, beside the others, so this can comfort that we both know the game and are heavy invested.
The reason, and it has to be a reason for a decision, is that the land is not done yet. Economics are not set, we don't know what it looks like, and we are asked to pay again for it.
The proposal is not a constructive one, as it punishes people who are not paying for the land survey, as the initial investment loses half it's value. There is another proposal going on, which is basical another DEC sink, where the SPS stakers are rewarded with the possibility to buy a card, depending on the stake. This is a good example how a DEC sink shall look like.