Players who are more skilled will still be able to earn more rewards with fewer or equal assets than less skilled players, as it should be.
How do you come to that conclusion?
I admit that I come at this mostly from a gameplay aspect. I'm not really here to get rich. Yeah I'm holding cards long term, but I'm more focused on playing the game. I don't have a bot play for me. If my ECR goes to 100 I miss out on those opportunities. So while I appreciate that this manipulates the market to increase scarcity which would be better $ value in the long run, I feel that it does it at the expense of game play which I currently value more. (I consider rewards a part of gameplay)
Question: what is a reasonable amount you would be expecting a new player to invest in order to earn on this game?
you can earn in bronze but with lvl 1 cards
Oh I see. But then still it's "Players who are more skilled will still be able to earn more rewards with fewer or equal assets than less skilled players, (in the same league according to their cards)as it should be.
If the point of the game is to reward investments, then we shouldn't even play the game. It should just be based off of market value of the cards played. Whomever plays the most expensive hand wins automatically. Maybe put an RNG in there so that they lose like 5% of the time or something. Investors would be happy and that's all that really matters.