Sterlin, what do you think of argumentation ethics? Do you think it is compatible with this "relationalism," or is Hoppe's logical proof of the private property ethic too hard for you? (pun-intended!) :D
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Yes sir. I do not think any form of logical position is inherently antithetical to relationalism. I think the two can be combined for an even stronger effect. However, I also think that relationalism and connections can be the primary instrument for getting people involved in anarchism. This could occur as a result of modeling, or allowing others to learn from our actions and relationships.