I very much agree that we humans will never see truth in an identical matter to others, and also that the globalist plan for the collective is antithetical to truth, freedom and love, and that we must resist this plan. However, I also believe we can most certainly collectively move forward in a positive direction, if we do so voluntarily, and not by means of force or coercion. In fact, much power is derived by humans working together voluntarily as a collective, and this power is only diminished when so-called collective progress is brought about through force as opposed to voluntarily by humans coming together in unity out of love and appreciation for one another.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
As long as we seek to enable very broad values we can agree. It is blatantly obvious that with increasing specificity of goals, increasing sectarianism, dissent, and the spectre of force inevitably rears it's ugly head. We can work together to enable freedom, but we are not all going to work together to enable freedom to consume what we choose, or to publish the speech we choose. Even at this extremely broad level of detail violent opposition arises, and instead of working together to achieve those things, we will devolve into violent opposition.
At least, this is what I see in the annals of history, as impacted by populist leaders, politicians, and powerful overlords.
The annals of history are relevant in this respect if we use the same methods used at that time, i think (as well as being relevant so we know what not to do).
We'll be using the same people, and that's the real issue.