Or you could stop maximizing ROI by votetrading to get the most post rewards no matter what your content is. This isn't pure proof of stake, there are other coins for that where you can just let your stake be, do nothing and get rewarded. This is proof of brain with delegated proof of stake where you're supposed to curate content no matter how big that other account is, if he's voting you back or not but focusing on the content he's generating, if it's of interest to you and you'd like to see more of it and reward the effort and time they put in to creating it.
Or you could cry that you didn't get your way and instantly give up and power down.
Let me clarify. You think I should not self-voting and not reward voting to high power visitors?
I agree and love concept of POB. but concerns on strict down-voting as of it. Your actions seem to be thought as a dscrimination that Hive user should be only allowed as contents provider and curator, not amateur, no middle-way.
Self-voting is fine, in moderation, but if you are only voting on a certain amount of other accounts and they all vote you back in exchange it is pretty much like selfvoting 10x per day but just on one post. It's not really that strict, some of you seem to have been votetrading and cheating yourself a higher ROI for a long time, how do you think that makes all other stakeholders feel when they've been getting less ROI but using their voting power to help the platform grow instead of just themselves.