Sort:  

Confirmed SPI member.
"Add an addition" is too generic. How about listing the future additions and then taking the vote?

Posted via Steemleo

Totally disagree.
Who is going to determine what is classified as abuse?
Every single member will have a different opinion on what's morally correct so to have a blanket statement to cover all is wrong imo.
As a member if I see a loophole I should point it out.
Its then down to the group to figure out a away to counter it.
This whole issue could have been simply solved much earlier as we knew who was buying direct then selling.
All that needed to be done was give a warning then stop selling to the individual but we wanted to sell tokens so that was alright.
I am not condoning the actions, but that's clever coz noone else spotted it and I would rather have someone like that in my club that can see an opportunity.

Posted using Partiko Android

"All that needed to be done was give a warning then stop selling to the individual"

Did this with 2 confirmed members already, I'd rather stop the problem compared to monitoring it. A blanket statement is the only thing that will work as loopholes and techniques are always changing.

Getting a bonus and reselling it for an instant profit is not smart, no wits required. I'd rather have someone that could tell us if BTC is gonna finish up are down every day!! :) are someone with a big STEEM wallet and influence.

Good feedback, thank you

Oh yeah confirmed spi member lol sorry forgot with the rant and all lol

Posted using Partiko Android

Confirmed SPI member.

Confirmed SPI member.

Confirmed SPI member