That's not what I'm getting form this post. If you post a photo and bot it up $100 it's going to get destroyed. If you post a quality article or content of some sort and give it a boost to $10 to hit the curve you should be fine. In my opinion.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Well, I mean, I'd like us to do away with bots entirely, but the economics of things are all topsy turvy regardless, so I'm asking to see if your opinion is shared by @theycallmedan and @themarkymark and the other powerful folks. I don't like abuse, and definitely never want to engage in abuse, but there are many different perspectives on abusive behavior, and I'd like my actions to fit no one's perspectives even accidentally. I got lambasted about freewrites 2 years ago before we became a big community, and I'm glad I stood up for our right to publish those on Steem, but I'm not willing to stand up for anyone's right to use bidbots since I'd rather they all go away entirely anyways. But if it's just "this is where we are, anyways" then I might as well accept them as the new necessary norm. It's very sad to watch my peers value disappear to the new curve and to know that it is actively wrong for them to vote on my posts because they're going to get less value than if they upvote a whale.