How to launch an SMT token properly?

in #smt7 years ago

how to launch an smt token on the steem network

Dear steemians,

Right now, I am musing on the topic of SMTs like so many others. It is great to see all the angles that people are taking on the topic. All we got right now is speculation since we don't have the thing working in front of us. But I wanted to talk about something that we can consider right now and even plan for...namely:

How to Launch an SMT token properly?

Like so many other products, the launch of something can have an incredible impact on it's success. Launching an SMT will be cheap ($1 SBD) but that doesn't mean that it should be treated as such.

Here are the factors that should be considered before launching an SMT

1. Why would people want to hold on to my Smart Media Token?

The #1 reason why people hold on to any token is the expectation of future value. As long as the hope is there, some people will hold on to it.

For people to have expectation of future value, you must sell a vision of what this token is about.

Where there is no vision, the people perish - Proverb 29:18

So what kind of vision a token can have? Well now, we have countless of example of what is possible. We've seen tokens like dogecoin and kekcoin being mostly based on their "meme" power.

There is also the community based token such as the one of the Let's Talk Bitcoin Show the LTBCoin that is earned via participation on their website.

Owning a certain amount of those coins can unlock special features of websites or content but fundamentally, these are not the tokens that people hold on to like grimdeath.

The token that people hold on to the most are the one attached to technology and utility. A Platform such as ZAPPL can have their own token where they focus on growing a large userbase that use their token and distribute it massively.

Since the SMTs will have the choice of to set to what degree SteemPower will affect rewards, there is the possibility to create truly independent silos of distribution and influence. I think, for example, that if ZAPPL rewards were independent from STEEMPOWER there would be a "gold rush" to be positioned as power player on their platform, invest and join early. Giving a new chance to those people who weren't there at the beginning of steemit.com

2. Economics

So what will be the economics of the token? Will there be a short supply with minimum inflation? Will there be small supply and massive inflation?

Knowing what is the best setting for your particular use case is very important and that's not something you can easily change once that is set.

3. Distribution

STEEM solves the biggest problem of all when it comes to distributing a token. ICOs and mining and sharedrops were the most common form of distribution scheme that we had before. But now, we have a much more powerful way to distribute tokens: upvotes!

Of course, you can combine multiple of those strategy simultaneously for increase impact.

An ICO helps a lot since you have time to build expectation, build a community, build an expectation of it's price on the market while the hype is growing. You can even build a steem community (community feature coming soon) while they are waiting for the launch.

4. Build a Team and be Transparent

People like to see real people working on a project. This increase the trust that people have in you carrying the project at hand.

5. Have good design

Have a website, FAQ and all the bells and whistle people expect when they are looking at a project.

Conclusion

There are a lot of ways an SMT could be launched and usecases that are outside of my imagination right now. If you think that I've missed anything, please make sure to let me know in the comment below how you would launch an SMT yourself.

Sort:  

Thanks for this. These tips are going to come in very handy as people plan for the best way to utilize these SMTs. I am trying to read as much as I can on the subject and your posts are a great help.

So it can be implemented on any current or future creative contents website??

This is amazing and t gives everyone equal chance to advance . I can't wait to create a creative coin and see others as well. I know I'm long term it will rise just like Steem. I see a lot of potential

will you open octopus coin?:)
i think important thing is name of coin and abbreviation , because people easy can remember name of coin if its easy to pronounce and have some meaning to it.

Oh man. That would be great! You should totally do it!

I like the way you think ;-)

The squidward coin.

Great post

I will make one for all us Off Griders .... Offgrid-Coin. ... OGC I already have the website all set up

Is Offgrid-Coin an oxymoron?

All these coins will be created and without the grid they will be inaccessible .... so they will be able to grow without ever being redeemed. Unlike the Bitcoins we all had and sold at the wrong time.

Yes.

OGC, where "always be HODLing" isn't just a good idea. It's the law!

HODLing is the only Option

Exactly ... there is no way out

When you buy off-grid coin and want to sell...

no way out

actually, there is automatic liquidity based on bancor tech. No need for a buyer when you want to sell!

Let's do this .... it will be bigger than Bitcoin

From what I understand, any SMT will be a kind of rebranded version of Steem, whereby the performance of one affects the performance of the other. If that is correct, then you get the opportunity to be a mini-CEO of Steemit - but for your own website.

One thing to bare in mind is that all currency - including fiat 'legal tender' currencies are really only backed by belief in their value. This means that when comparing them for which is 'the best' - in many cases there really is no best because they are all essentially valueless. In some cases, there are tangible benefits to some as compared to others - such as Steem's high efficiency level and speed of transaction.

To successfully launch an SMT means understanding how your SMT is going to provide VALUE above and beyond the long list of other tokens and that requires creativity and attention to detail.

Where SMT performance affects STEEM performance really depends on what people do with that token. If they sell it for STEEM they need STEEM which drives to STEEM demand and price. If they then sell the STEEM for another coin or fiat they send the price down. Even so I believe that is what is called increasing the velocity of the currency and that drives up the price (I think). But the whitepaper does actually talk about the scenario where an SMT has no effect on STEEM price.

One effect I wish did propagate from STEEM to tokens and perhaps back is reputation. While I would expect a 1:1 translation I feel like there are many aspects of reputation that do translate 1:1. Others may be community and content specific. Someone who is an expert in astrology may know jack-**** about science and would have no inherent science based reputation. And visa versa of course. No astrology SMT wants some highly reputable scientist barging in and down voting all their content.

But reputation also has aspects like are you an annoying bot and do you post spam or so you troll incessantly. These probably translate across all communities (although what one community considers trolling can vary). And of course people may not want to maintain identity between STEEM and a SMT token. I have to admit I wasn't paying attention when I read the whitepaper but I think it is assumed identity is distinct for ever SMT. That is I'm not a STEEM user who owns multiple types of SMT tokens, I'm multiple users, distinct and separate.

I haven't finished reading the whitepaper, but I did finish reading the whitepaper for the bancor protocol which another commenter said that SMTs were partially based on. In their system, the new currencies have a value that is inter-related to the base currency (Steem, in this case). However, SMTs may not be using the same principles.

Reputation is a key issue, yes, I agree - I posted about that with regards SMTs already.

Interesting. I was working on a post about reputation too but decided it needed some diagrams and didn't get around to doing any. It was basically an elaboration on what I said above. Maybe having reputation was considered so obvious they didn't include it? But I would say it is essential. Allowing a token to (optionally) inherit or seed its base reputation from STEEM or another token would be great IMO and allow minimizing of trolling and spam.

In the back of my mind I recall hearing how reputation was a function of Steemit rather than Steem - but I might be mistaken.

I think you are probably right since there is only one mention of "reputation" in the Steem whitepaper https://steem.io/SteemWhitePaper.pdf and it is not about the reputation we are talking about. I suppose that SMT using sites could still look at reputation on Steem or elsewhere - if they can positively correlate two identities across the networks.

Also came across this post that explains the logarithmic calculation of reputation and that is stored on the blockchain: https://steemit.com/steemit/@digitalnotvir/how-reputation-scores-are-calculated-the-details-explained-with-simple-math

I take that to confirm what I said, that any external app could query your reputation if it can confirm your id - presumably via something you sign with one of your keys that would verify your id.

This brings up a further issue that needs clarification. Do sites that operate SMTs require their users to have a steem user id (that could be used to login to steemit, for example) - or not. I imagine that such a username/id would be required, but I haven't seen anything about mechanisms for perhaps autocreating the names for people who are members of your site, but not of steem/steemit.

Additionally, there is the question of whether posts to your site will be visible in Steemit or not - which is something else I haven't seen mentioned anywhere that I have looked yet.

Good points.
I think this is going to be a VERY interesting development.
Kinda looking forward to the Frank coin if ya know what I meme ; )

Thanks.. Do you own a franking business? :)

All of the methods listed by you can be tried, but I would start with the fifth method and developed an excellent design at the beginning. Thank you @cryptoctopus

May be little more on how to do it would help ?

The technology is not launched yet. We just have the whitepaper. Unless you meant something else?

No I meant what you mean :). Reading the white paper it looks its very easy.

SMT has as much intrinsic value as you can get behind it.

Launching your own SMT is basically launching your own Steemit, only it's not called Steemit. It's a cryptocurrency for your own website. But it's still a Steem coin, so it gives value to Steem as it grows. Which is great for us!

This post explains the "HOW". I explain the "WHAT" HERE.

It's definitely exciting to see what happens next, in a way I've joined at the right time...missing out the fact I could have joined at the start!

Another speculative subject - how will it affect the value of Steem? Not just the currency but the content too.

I think this thing could be a lifesaver to certain media organizations. All they have to do is implement it correctly and make sure it gets promoted in the right way.

Need little more explanation how to do it and why $1 SBD is required to launch SMT?

It's usually just an Initial Coin Offering that does the trick. Kind of like a crowd funding campaign. I explain it more in depth HERE if you want to read up.

Thank you

there is a price to the network to create an asset.

I have been thinking about SMT technology for Discussion Forums like " bodybuilding.com". They are a huge site with a solid user base . I think about how someone like me could bring SMT to them. You post reminded me of how I would sell the idea .Why build a community from scratch when there are so many existing community's that can be transformed. So instead of creating a community, create a team that transforms existing community's. What do you think?

I agree. I think this is a great explanation of the how-to.

Great post,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
I know I'm long term it will rise just like Steem. I see a lot of potential.............////////////

From my perspective #4 is very important. Without a great team you won't go far but importantly is being transparent. The full faith and trust is vital.

Ok but the market will become flooded with coins, diluting the value of other cryptos

Personally, I'd favour a long introduction time, limited supply, but with ample incentive to miners, not for the necessity of mining (EOS is coming, mining will die), but simply because miners create a great culture of value appreciation.

Hi mate! The way you explained about how to launch an smt token if we are interested is really very clear and can help of lot for sure.
Same like you listed it on the first position, the WHY of holding the coin is the most inportant step to tackle first. Once you have ticked that step, we can say the rest will be easy to tackle afterwards.
Thanks for giving such amazing ideas to all!

i really hope that there will not be so many people that create so much useless tokens. maybe they should rise the price from $1 to $1000 or something, don't know..

if they aren't used (spam), I don't see the issue.

many people would just create tokens for spam or for ridicolous thing i think, but we will see.

I don't see how it matters. Steemit will be in silos via community and people who have successful communities with SMTs some without. The long tail of communities, just like in reddit, are complete failures but the top 1% (/r/funny and others) have 99% of the traffic. You need lots of failures to get a few successes.

that will take the platform to next level, followed

@cryptoctopus,
Few years back I had an idea to launch my own coin (not a coin scam like lots of ICO did), but I had no back up at that time! Anyway, now everything is here and I think I could start my work! Moreover, here I can see a strong community support also! Specially people like you can help technical wise! Thank you very much for sharing such useful information! Really appreciate your work friend!

Cheers~

i don't have much knowledge on this topic but you explained it quite well thanks for that really helpful that was :) everyone want to learn more about SMT's this will be a game changer for sure !!

@cryptoctopus - This is a very informative post Sir. But I don't have an idea to launch my own coin Sir. If I do, I'll make a coin based on cookery Sir :) Nice information you shared Sir. Love your work <3

+W+ [UpVoted & ReSteemed]

Wow . That's amazing
index.png

Great Words to live by!!!!

Bitshares made it possible. Ethereum and Counter Party made it cheap. I didn't really make time to read the SMT white paper, but it seems like this has been done before.

Steem is the only one with no trade and transfer fees.

I'm very interested in the SMT concept as a business model, for a blockchain with a specific application (in this case social forums and discussion) to provide its application for others to iterate new applications and interest-based communities onto.

I'm considering this model for our own network, which connects people to ecovillages and off-grid living schools around the world, but could just as well be used to create and link networks of hacker spaces and digital nomad paradises, coliving, cannabis B&Bs, and other decentralized communities linked by a shared interest.

Is anyone familiar with other blockchain business models with specific applications that get open-sourced for other entrepreneurs to launch similar applications on top of? Sharetribe is the closest thing that comes to mind in Capitalism 2.0 (although I wouldn't be surprised if they tokenize soon!).

It should not cost just $1 to issue a token, at least in the beggining.
Cost should be high enough to limit number of garbage coins.
Fees should be burned, benefitting all steem holders.

I don't agree. What does it matter if there is a bunch of useless coins that are worth nothing? What matter is that there is a level playing field for experimentation. 99% token, whether they cost $1 or $100 will fail, that's just the how it works in life. All the worthless token will just be at the bottom and the good project will float to the top.

Fees are a huge deterrent for adoption. If you want to attract traders and speculators, the STEEMs will be locked into successful SMTs and reduce the supply anyway.

There should be some deterrent against spamming the network with garbage tokens and $1 is likely not enough.
How about launching SMT protocol with relatively high issue fee $100-1000 at first, so only serious projects do it and gradually reducing this fee over time as SMT tech matures?

Most importantly don't try to use this as a get rich scheme and scam people. If you don't already have something established don't think people will just come out of the woodworks to buy the token that you just created.

I've been running a noncrypto currency with my husband for the past 4-5 years. www.tetla.org -- I think I would draw upon our experience with that in launching an SMT. We are attempting something like an SMT launch with our own ICO... www.futurecredit.org but it's a long tough road to hoe on that.

hi @cryptooctopus i do have a very creative idea for my upcoming SMT we are also looking forward to build a team around this.
guys please follow me for upcoming updates in this regard

@cryptoctopus so is there a way to launch a SMT now or will we have to wait until the release?

Check out the system that we have designed to be an SMT. well actually, we designed it, and then found out about SMTs ha ha. Currentxchange.com

I think this article really helps the reader to understand the sentence phrases that exist.
the framework of writing also attracts the readers