there are a number of servers or projects that autovote their members, yet some do not monitor users to make sure content retains a measure of quality. also, i suppose that my ideas of quality might not match others. i've been told that quality is subjective, that a meme has as much value as an essay. call me old fashioned, on this i will never agree.
Quality:
“The good writers touch life often. The mediocre ones run a quick hand over her. The bad ones rape her and leave her for the flies.”
~ Ray Bradbury, Fahrenheit 451 ~
I definitely hear you there. I think it Auto vote communities can be great, and I have been in them myself. As you know I try to make every post a good post comma which is why I am in those amenities to begin with. I take my responsibility quite seriously and I think there are expectations that you do produce good content. There is nothing wrong with that. However some people abuse the fact that they are getting this, and when nothing is done to monitor shit content then it is a failure of the system and a failure of the responsibility of the people within the group. In some of the groups I have been in I have gone and taken away my vote manually after the auto vote if I believe it is a shit Post or I hate the content
Posted using Partiko Android