The Wikipedia link you sent uses subjective criteria again, and its something that we want to replace, since Web 2.0 companies like Twitter use subjective criteria to censor people.
The marked content may contain nudity, intense sexuality, political incorrectness, profanity, slurs, violence or other potentially disturbing subject matter.
I didn't see any of the above in the post we are talking about @savvyplayer, and I think it is a bad idea to consider content that is "Politically Incorrect" as #NSFW since political correctness is often a result of propaganda, and I don't think that should be used as a standard.
I did not say that I agree with everything on the wiki article. I just said that I can say that I agree with the content of the page (in general). I also don't want to talk about "political correctness". 🙅♂️
I already got your point that #nsfw is subjective, except when you can directly see a nude or violent image. 🤨
You linked to the article, and I pointed out the flaws I saw in it.
If you don't want to talk about political correctness, don't link to a source that calls it's opposite #NSFW.
#NSFW does not always have to be subjective, it depends on the criteria used
Posted via D.Buzz
Okay, I think we can consider this settled.
Posted via D.Buzz