You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: it doesn't feel quite nice

in #shadow • 4 years ago (edited)

This is a decentralised platform
And you cannot decide if this is nsfw or not. And the fact you tagged Ecency and others is also not correct. If you don’t like it don’t follow , and only when you scroll it appears. And another tip maybe you shouldn’t open the blog while at work that will save you some trouble maybe.

I think AND THERE EVEN IS A RANT COMMUNITY that if somebody is brave enough to tell inner feelings and issues it’s to short sighted to just tell its nsfw , and I could have agreed with you that if the RANT WAS DONE NAKED and it was shared online YOU WOULD HAVE BEEN RIGHT. Not now. I appreciate people commenting but stick to the mute and unfollow button don’t put a wrong badge on a good blog.

Ecency might need to fix that muted blogs don’t appear but again this time your tag and commmet are not ok. Don’t judge just READ

4 years ago in #shadow by
$0.00
    Reply 8
    Sort:  
  • Trending
    • [-]
     4 years ago  

    See my first response to you at https://peakd.com/@brittandjosie/re-ecency-qsf7u0.

    1. If I can't convince everyone that the post is #nsfw, it still stands as #nsfw for me. The fact that @stayten was able to post such things which some people would not like also means that I am also free to post things that some people would not like or agree upon.
    2. The fact that you said that "maybe you shouldn’t open the blog while at work" is like telling me that I "should not open #Ecency at work because the post might show up on my feed again and be seen by other people".
    3. I tagged the Ecency team for a bug report, not because I want the post censored in any way. It's good that you acknowledge that the Ecency team should fix the problem of muted accounts showing up on "Promoted" feed for the users who muted such authors.

    I will wait for your clarifications for my previous comment and this one.

    @chrisrice @atma.love

    $0.03
    • Past Payouts $0.03
    • - Author $0.02
    • - Curators $0.02
    1 vote
    Reply
    [-]
     4 years ago  

    The fact that @stayten was able to post such things which some people would not like also means that I am also free to post things that some people would not like or agree upon.

    Ummm, well yeah. That's what #FreeSpeech is, the ability to say things that other people don't like.

    The fact that you said that "maybe you shouldn’t open the blog while at work" is like telling me that I "should not open #Ecency at work because the post might show up on my feed again and be seen by other people".

    It's also like saying not to open Facebook at work, which most employers don't want their employees to do.

    But on a real note, I don't think anyone would get in trouble for viewing @stayten's post at work, it's not nudity or violence, it's not even controversial, just an unusual image.

    As for #3, I think you did a good job, and again, these are all just discussions, nothing wrong going on here . . but what is your criteria for #NSFW? @savvyplayer

    1. My understanding is that nudity & violence constitutes #NSFW.
    2. & I think content that "other people don't like" is not appropriate to be called #NSFW, since for one, it's a subjective criteria, and 2, #FreeSpeech is about being able to say what people don't want to hear.
    $0.00
      Reply
      [-]
       4 years ago  
      1. I definitely agree with what is on wikipedia.org/wiki/Not_safe_for_work regarding #nsfw.
      2. I did not say that just because something is unusual, it is NSFW.
      3. There are also certain text (not just the images) on the original author's post that are #nsfw (at least for me), though I don't want to quote them directly for obvious reasons.
      4. Objective criteria such as nudity and graphic violence are definitely NSFW, but NSFW content is not limited to those two.
      5. I recommended the post be tagged as #nsfw not just because I don't agree or like it, but because it would be offensive for at least some people like me.
      6. My criteria for NSFW is any sensitive content I would not like anybody else to know I am looking at, not only at the workplace (as the word 'W' in NSFW says) but at places where there are kids (who are much younger than me).
      7. I know that it is harder to understand that nudity or violence which is just placed in text is also #nsfw.
      $0.00
        Reply
        [-]
         4 years ago  

        The Wikipedia link you sent uses subjective criteria again, and its something that we want to replace, since Web 2.0 companies like Twitter use subjective criteria to censor people.

        The marked content may contain nudity, intense sexuality, political incorrectness, profanity, slurs, violence or other potentially disturbing subject matter.

        I didn't see any of the above in the post we are talking about @savvyplayer, and I think it is a bad idea to consider content that is "Politically Incorrect" as #NSFW since political correctness is often a result of propaganda, and I don't think that should be used as a standard.

        $0.00
          Reply
          [-]
           4 years ago  

          I did not say that I agree with everything on the wiki article. I just said that I can say that I agree with the content of the page (in general). I also don't want to talk about "political correctness". 🙅‍♂️

          I already got your point that #nsfw is subjective, except when you can directly see a nude or violent image. 🤨

          $0.00
            Reply
            [-]
             4 years ago  

            1. You linked to the article, and I pointed out the flaws I saw in it.

            2. If you don't want to talk about political correctness, don't link to a source that calls it's opposite #NSFW.

            3. #NSFW does not always have to be subjective, it depends on the criteria used

              Posted via D.Buzz

            $0.00
              Reply
              [-]
               4 years ago  
              1. Okay. 😑
              2. I didn't know you would focus on that. 😒
              3. I just mentioned that it is not always subjective. 🤨
              $0.00
                Reply
                Load more...