Fair enough, as he put it he compiles scientific data in the areas where he hasn't done experiments himself. The mere mention of the large-scale deviation from G that as he claimed happened simulatenously all over the world as shown by the records is totally worth pointing out in my book.

His research focuses on other experiments involving the sense of being stared at and the like.

I have no way of measuring G and I simply noted his remarks in my mind as something to keep in mind and follow up on, but you are correct , any verifiable claim needs to be tested ultimately. How convenient then that the light meter has been fixed and redefined.

I find the whole paradigm of Newton's metaphysics highly questionable, not sure how familiar you are with Newton's occult interests and the neccessity for his "gravitational constant" to make his calculations and the broader emerging cosmology of the day work out. But that would be a discussion for another say as I am about to go dancing for a week and still haven't packed <3

We will talk more about G in the future as a lot of contemporary cosmology needs it to work out properly and most have not tested it themselves but simply believed the notion that bodies are attracted to each other due to their masses... that claim in itself is something worth looking into deeper and has not been demonstrated satisfacotirily in my opinion.

Anyways, thanks for sharing your thoughts!