So why isn't there any that show they are harmful? I say that because the title is misleading then (@irime
Does Aluminum as an adjuvant in vaccines cause Autism?). For instance Polysorbate80 will take the aluminum throught the blood-brain barrier and since aluminum is neurotoxic you know it causes harm. There I said it in one sentence.
I'm not going to discuss vaccinations under the results of my challenge post... If you have a problem with the placement of winners, take 110 SBD and do your own challenge.
You are talking around the problem and that's what I don't like. I was referring to the misleading title and that is a misleading title. She actually didn't prove aluminum doesn't cause harm, she proved that the science was bad, sure but why? What is the motivation for picking this? Because you guys believe vaccines are safe because the science is settled?
Aside from the fact that almost all judges placed that post as "top 1"...
Did you even read it? The post shows how the paper discussed straight out fakes results by photoshopping unwanted stuff out.
If anything, the post is about the misconception that you can blindly trust published papers.
So why isn't there any that show they are harmful? I say that because the title is misleading then (@irime
Does Aluminum as an adjuvant in vaccines cause Autism?). For instance Polysorbate80 will take the aluminum throught the blood-brain barrier and since aluminum is neurotoxic you know it causes harm. There I said it in one sentence.
I'm not going to discuss vaccinations under the results of my challenge post... If you have a problem with the placement of winners, take 110 SBD and do your own challenge.
I have a problem with bias and fake science nothing more Suesa.
So you should be incredibly angry about the faked results in the paper irime is analyzing - and basically agree with her.
You are talking around the problem and that's what I don't like. I was referring to the misleading title and that is a misleading title. She actually didn't prove aluminum doesn't cause harm, she proved that the science was bad, sure but why? What is the motivation for picking this? Because you guys believe vaccines are safe because the science is settled?
Familiarity Bias
So there's a paper (clearly linked with the word paper) in this post on why aluminum and other metals are neurotoxic. So of course kuddo's the Irime for doing real science but the title is still misleading and hugely so.