Excellent article and nearly, if not all of, everything that you've stated has also been position for a number of years now. I've even debated with 2 college professors regarding flawed, erroneous and unreliable "scientific evidence" and it's like each and every time it's at best EXCEPTIONALLY difficult for them to even (if ever) consider that, as you've so well stated, that "They can be biased, make errors, have wrong assumptions and most importantly, they can be manipulated either financially or ideologically. Another major issue is that scientific evidence cannot produce facts. Ever. "
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
you are breaking their rice bowls when you question them
..while they brake my balls
LOL
there is so much to complain about in the academic community; institutional bias, lack of a true peer review process, the replicibility problem, "scholar-activists", keeping the results of research behind the paywall of academic journals, etc etc
It's past time we break their balls and their rice bowls
blockchain tech is going to be key in doing that
my favourite: tenureship
much like being a king. Once you rise to that position, nothing can dethrone you, no matter what. you just die on that chair and some other douche inherits the position.
Was Ward Churchill tenured? Don't remember on that; they had to convene a review board for something they knew he was doing all along
It wasn't even the academic fraud that undid him, it was that genocidal statement of his about the 9/11 victims that caused public outcry...the fraud didn't bother them at all, it was just the reason they used to satisfy the public
have no idea. politics were definitely involved though (much like it is the case with this academic farce)
I have debated my fair share of these institutionalized loonies myself.