"No one is producing natural resources. They come from the Earth."
From a first grade logic that's 100% true. Natural Resources are widely available on the Earth. They do need to be harvested though. Those fish you eat are caught by people. That house you live in was harvested by a lumber company from forests. That water you shower in was piped to you by government infrastructure. So yeah, Natural Resources are provided by the Earth, but inorder for us to use them, they need to be transformed into useable products by humans.
"Money is not a resource but a piece of paper. Contract that has value because you believe that it has."
Money is a currency, which is tradable for resources. Sure you could light it on fire, but you could also use it to purchase something (just because you don't seem to value it doesn't mean society disvalues it.)
"Please, explore RBE better before making underinformed assumptions."
Aside from the terrible grammar in this quote, I think I've blown enough holes in your story with my limited view of RBE with the research I've already done.
Concerning:
"They do need to be harvested though."
Use ROBOT HARVESTERS
Concerning :
"Those fish you eat are caught by people"
Use ROBO-FISHERS
Concerning:
"That water you shower in was piped to you by government infrastructure"
use ROBO-DIGGERS, ROBO-BUILDERS, ROBO-PLUMBERS, ROBO-TRUCKS,
I might disagree with almost everything you say, but the Architecture in the Youtube video was pretty baller.
I do not see any holes blown but underinformed assumptions.
”Aside from the terrible grammar in"
Another logical fallacy. Ad hominem and red herring.
Pathetic attempt to direct conversation towards possible, petty grammar or spelling mistakes.
You are welcome to "educate" me about what was so terribly incorrect in that sentence.