If you want to replace a largely admitted theory by a new one, you must at least explain as good as the former theory all the phenomena the former theory explains. That is it.
(I already answered that somewhere on Steemit, but I do not remember whether it was to your post... my comment seems to be appropriate anyhow :p )
PS: very nice series!
well, you got to know this sort of thing quite well as you're a scientist :)
That was in response to one of mine @lemouth but still, the point is valid.