There is no universal way of doing science. Basically every point you made can be refuted here. I answered in other comments as well
There is no universal way of doing science. Basically every point you made can be refuted here. I answered in other comments as well
I'm protected by an Inverse True Scotsman Fallacy - if it's not infallible, it's not scientific proof.
Science is all about finding out what we can, with what we've got.
And posting Lee Smolin's opinion on it, especially in this manner, is deceptive. Not informative.