Yet you provide no EVIDENCE that I have bias, or that he's correct. I provided EVIDENCE why he's wrong and even why he is so ignorant about his topic that he's asking for hundreds of times more money than he needs, and why it will still not be likely to change his mind.

You are simply using the logical fallacy of appeal to tradition. It is ridiculous to think that we should take ALL wild claims seriously because OCCASIONALLY some wild claims are proven to be true.

And, in fact, his wild claims have been DISPROVEN for a thousand years.

You get this one warning. Stay on topic. No logical fallacies. Support your claims with evidence.

If you continue this convo, and you do not follow these requests, you'll be downvoted.