Thanks for investing time in looking a bit deeper into this project. In times like these, when scam coins jump up the ladder, it's of upmost importance to know what it is exactly, where you invest your money.

I've also looked into the project and especially checked some of the details you dug up to see if your concerns are legit. There's a few things that need clarification as some of your points don't hold up in my opinion:

Lockchain was first

You're right, lockchain was first. However, there's enough space for multiple companies doing the same thing. It's also common in emerging markets that there's a multitude of contrahends contesting over market share. When looking at AMD and Intel, nobody would argue over who was first in the market. It's simply no argument at all and the stronger will prevail.

This is also the reason why a lawsuit would be pointless. As long as you don't hold a patent on something, you can't protect an idea.

On one point I agree with you: Having the "0% Commissions" slogan is a bit more than a coincidence. They've definitely adapted it from Lockchain and it's a pity that they're not more creative than that.

Beetoken copied Lockchain's whitepaper

First of all, if you claim such a thing, you'd better deliver hard evidence on this matter. You might have heard of the controversy in the SOMN vs. DADI debate. It's been made clear by the community, with a little help from plagiarism tools, that those two whitepapers overlap.

I've downloaded both papers, I've copied their text and put them in every plagiarism engine I could find. Apart from two rather generic sentences, there has been no result in terms of overlaps.

The role of Johnathan Chou at Uber

All your observations seem to be true. On the coins website, he's described as Lead in Security and Fraud, whereas on his Quora profile he's denoted as software engineer. Well that doesn't add up, right? There's another link we can follow. On his linkedin profile the riddle is solved:

Tech Lead on Fraud & Machine Learning / Cyber Security department.

Turns out, the division he was working on was Security & Fraud, while the role he executed was that of a tech lead in software engingeering.

Channel ban

To be fair, you've been officially warned before the ban. I must say that you've rather been on the aggressive side and had a clear opinion in your head instead of having questions as you stated in the chat.
Together with an awful lot of mistakes and implying that the project is a total scam, I can understand that you've been kicked after one clear warning. He's been rude as a reaction, which shouldn't have happened.

I've done my reasearch because I'm honestly interested in the project and not because I'm invested in it or have ties to the members. I hope I could add to the discussion and correct some of the points that I found out were unsubstantial or unfounded.