Dan's original article had to have been a satire too. If it wasn't, I'd like to argue his premise that higher intelligence is going to mean higher paying job without considering other factors (Economy, demand, competition, what society values, nepotism/cronyism, mental stability/health, assertiveness and drive of the candidate...) Cognitively privileged oppressor that I am, lol.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
At first I thought it had to be satire too, and maybe it is, just formulated in a way that I am too relatively cognitively oppressed to recognize. I included the link to the original in my post above, and it doesn't appear to be satire to me, check it and tell me if I am wrong. Thanks for the reply!