"The argument of creationists is that there is one original originator. Science would back up that for every action there must be an equal and opposite reaction."

False, cause and effect would just mean this originator requires a cause as well. The second you try and break this chain of infinite regress you are committing special pleading. You must invalidate the concept of cause and effect to make any argument for an uncaused cause.

If your god can exist without being created then the universe can exist without being created.

"For the atheist, the circle must at some point embrace chance and accident. "

False, you are arguing against a straw man. Please stop mandating what opponents to your reasoning must think as some sort of framework on which to prop up your own god hypothesis. It's very telling that you seem entirely unable to do this.

God is not the default answer and won't be proven true by proving something else wrong. You are approaching this from a fallacious angle.

At this point I'm not sure how to explain this to you without you complaining that I'm being condescending. You just keep making the same fallacious argument from ignorance. Say something related to the two major points I wrote about in the post. If you continue to respond here and keep repeating this fallacious line of argument I will respond with actual condescension and mockery.