Part of the challenge is that "creation" is not observable. It's a historical science, so must be approached based on post de-facto evidence. The order of creation testifies of a creator. You deny that this is true. That's fine. I'm not bent on convincing you. I just disagree.
It cannot be disproven either. Any claims to have done so are disingenuous, at best.
If you are in a place of just wondering, then good for you. If you are an atheist (a logical assumption from the title), then you are making a claim that there is no God - an unprovable. If you're searching or wondering, then I salute your intellectual honesty. Perhaps you are agnostic?
Regardless, we won't get anywhere. What I claim is self-evident you refute with your own perspective. Continuing dialogue probably won't make a difference.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
"It cannot be disproven either. "
The burden is on you to prove it not for others to disprove it. I must state again that god and a creator are not a default answer.
" then you are making a claim that there is no God"
I know you wish that were the case but it isn't. Get over it already and stop trying to force beliefs on to people in an effort to make your own false beliefs seem more reasonable. It's annoying and childish.
I accept your tacit surrender.