I gave you a direct quote from your article, there is no misinterpreting it. Unlike the bible there is not a thousand different translations about your words.
So again, I ask,why would anyone think that they could gain understanding and know the creator through created things?
I do not argue that god couldnt do these things, merely arguing that god is not nessisary for them to exist. If he actually exists, they may even be the reason for his existence. If god was just the first creation, then its not absurd to think he would be deluded by the fact into thinking he is somehow different.
Um, do you know how to copy and paste alex-draw. Copy and paste it in context. You've lost your game, and now you're just reaching.
I think you're referring to the basic principles of Pantheism. Don't you know your own beliefs?
Now, will you stop hijacking my thread?
Ill stop when you decide to stop attacking pantheism or only post your articles with a christian tags.
"So the question is, why would anyone think that they could gain understanding and know the creator through created things? There certainly are elements within creation that demonstrate God's wisdom and glory. A beautiful sunset would be one of those things, but the sunset itself could not teach me about the creator other than the fact that HE created some of the most powerful and magnificent things imaginable."
So by your own words, you can not attempt to understand god through the bible any more then you can through a book of my own creation.