Greetings, these two ideas or projects seem good to me from different points of view, as does the @commentrewarder, which is a very good option to incentivize and reward those who visit our posts. I consider reblogs equally necessary because a reblogged post has a high probability of being seen, and that's good for encouraging participation. If the author decides to use the benefit and reward, that's their decision. I, personally, would use it and promote it. Reblogs have helped me many times, and I'm currently helping small users with my reblogs. Rewarding effective reblogs is wonderful, and I would say very useful as long as the objective is achieved; the reward is justified.

Regarding permanent staking, I think it's very positive if those in charge have a broad vision of curation and those who direct the votes assume the ethical responsibility that it entails. It would become a great project if it's carried out responsibly and in a balanced way.

In addition, it would be very beneficial for the platform's economy, without the fear that the whale might disappear or decide to leave someday. Without a doubt, it's a great project, and it would be fantastic if others joined in.