Practice makes perfect, but what type of practice works best? One place that people are constantly putting more and more time into are online video games. The more people play, the better they get.
Source: flickr
What insights can be learned from this unlikely domain of online gaming to understand more about how people improve their skills?
Research into gaming mastery was published in the journal Topics in Cognitive Science. Data generated from thousands of games for Halo: Reach and StarCraft 2 were used to reveal how different patterns of play produce different rates of skill development.
Online gaming provides a rich dataset to measure the patterns of people over a long period of time. Gamers in the strategy game StarCraft 2 have unique and consistent behavior that contributes to repeated success that can be detected through such data.
One of the studies in the paper looked at the metric called TrueSkill in the game Halo: Reach. As someone plays matches and becomes more proficient at killing other players, their skill level changes. Analyzing this data allowed researchers to determine what kinds of playing habits influenced their ability to acquire better skills at winning.
The research confirms the importance of time in developing skills. Those who played the most matches each week (64+) had the largest increase in their skills. But playing a lot of games isn't the only factor to improve skill. Instead of looking at a larger span of time, looking at each match itself showed that those who played 4 to 8 matches per week gained more skill per match compared to those who played 8 to 16 matches per week.
Jeff Huang, lead author and computer science professor at Brown University, said:
"What this suggests is that if you want to improve the most efficiently, it's not about playing the most matches per week. You actually want to space out your activity a little bit and not play so intensively."
Playing too long and too intensely seems to have a negative impact compared to those who played less intensely but still frequently. Short breaks of 1 to 2 days and not a big deal, but long breaks have long-term effects in losing skill. After a 30 day break it takes about 10 matches to get back to the skill level they had previously achieved 30 days prior.
Moderation is good to maximize learning efficiency, as long as the moderation away from engaging in a skillset is not too long.
StarCraft is a whole other game compared to the more simple shoot-to-kill of Halo: Reach. Hundreds a game units need to be managed, along with building a base, managing economies and training soldiers with certain skill sets for combat or other strategic importance. In StarCraft speed is key, and those that use hotkeys set the gap between the skilled and the less skilled players. Less skilled players use more of a point-and-click command for individual units, but elite players use hotkeys to quickly command units in certain groups. The elite players get around 200 actions per minute (APM).
Hot keys aren't the only thing, but unique and consistent habits in using the hot key skills matter. Specific players could be identified through their behavior with a 90% accuracy just by looking at their hotkey patterns. Gaming behavior becomes almost second nature to easily be able to keep their cool and issue commands despite the increase in pressure as the game develops. Elite players use their hotkeys even at the beginning of the match when there are few units and play. They warm-up, prime and prep their minds and bodies to get into the routine that they need later in the game for peak performance.
Huang is helpful this work will shed light into how performance works in other domains. Perhaps warming up certain skill sets, like is done in StarCraft, would be helpful for people whose jobs require paying attention to many things which requires a certain multitasking ability.
For learning in general, this study shows what many people already know from their own experience: that cramming is usually less efficient than going through smaller bits of data throughout a longer time period. If you want to increase your skills in something, you generally have to practice consistently and also "stay warm" with those skills so that they don't fade away from your habitual behavior.
Consistency is key, but not so much that it's being done too much and crams our minds with too much data. We need some time to process and let it to sink in to become almost like second nature to us.
References:
- New studies illustrate how gamers get good
- Jeff Huang et al, Master Maker: Understanding Gaming Skill Through Practice and Habit From Gameplay Behavior, Topics in Cognitive Science (2017). DOI: 10.1111/tops.12251
Thank you for your time and attention! I appreciate the knowledge reaching more people. Take care. Peace.
If you appreciate and value the content, please consider:
Upvoting , Sharing or Reblogging below.
Looking to contact me? Find me on Discord or send me a message on SteemKURE.
Please also consider supporting me as a Steem Witness by voting for me at the bottom of the Witness page; or just click on the upvote button if I am in the top 50:
If you are unsure how to vote for witnesses, you can put my name in the "SET PROXY" section at the bottom of the Witness Voting page which will use my witness votes.
2017-03-03, 12:02pm
Hello @KrNel,
Congratulations! Your post has been chosen by the communities of SteemTrail as one of our top picks today.
Also, as a selection for being a top pick today, you have been awarded a TRAIL token for your participation on our innovative platform...STEEM.
Please visit SteemTrail to get instructions on how to claim your TRAIL token today.
If do not wish to be promoted by SteemTrail, please reply with "Stop" to opt out.
Happy TRAIL!
Thank you!
I played Call Of Duty for years- I would guess I was a little above average- never used any sort of glitches or cheats- I mean what's the point of playing a game if you're going to cheat right? I retired with a 1.28 kill/death ration- not too bad for a guy in his late 40's right?
I always thought it was funny how surprised the spring chickens were to here my older voice when I miked up- many of them thought that perhaps they were the first gen of gamers and an old man like me had no business gaming much less being reasonably good- sorry kiddies but if you weren't playing pong and Atari 2600 in the 70's then you're a newbie in my book- LOL
For years I would play an average 2 hours per day. One day I gave it some thought as to how depraved it really was that here I was making a game out of simulating the killing other human beings. After some thought I dropped it cold turkey and haven't picked up a controller in 3 or so years. It wasn't long after that I dropped cable TV and stopped watching broadcast TV of any sort.
I believe this along with other lifestyle changes including a vegetarian diet and avoiding chemicals and radio frequencies from smart meters/wi fi (as much as one can anyway) has played a significant role in raising my awareness and my connectivity to the universe. This in turn allows you to really sharpen what I believe is now my most powerful and most important sense- my intuition. I also took measures to maximize and fine tune my pineal gland (third eye) which is like our modem to the universe.
I am absolutely convinced that broadcast/cable are designed to lower that connectivity via various frequencies, subliminal messaging- and of course games like COD desensitize us to violence and make us less compassionate and empathetic towards our fellow human beings.
I will say that games like COD can definitely help keep you mentally sharp as well as eye hand coordination. If you play live against other real people then it certainly helps you hone your combat skills- sure you aren't going through the physical motions that a real soldier would BUT with some muscle memory and physical conditioning that can be developed in a relatively short period of time. The reason I believe games like COD live can really sharpen combat skills it it can really make you good at understanding how others think and staying one step ahead of them.
So much time in people lives are wasted in these cul-de-sacs that go nowhere. Games are detrimental to humanity. We lack self-control, and then immerse so much of our lives wasted in pointless games that won't serve our real live or help us get anywhere productive in life, to do something good in the world, etc. Despite enhancements to reflexes or some types of thinking, overall its a waste of time that we get sucked into because its a funner, alternative reality that is less boring than our regular lives. That's why "augmented" fake-reality is popular, games are popular because they take us into another world that is less boring than the lives we have created for ourselves here. Thanks for the feedback.
Agree 100%- I only pointed out the 'positives' before somebody else did- it's obvious that they pale in comparison to the negatives.
This is too accurate for a game like League of legends, or any MOBA really.
I notice that after a week without playing I'm reeeally off my game, and I also notice I can't improve anymore and get frustrated after playing for a long period of time.
Other games however, I feel like I can improve forever... I say it depends on the game.
Good to know. Thanks!