thank you, you pointed that already out in the article which I found good that you did that. So, when actually the premise "not to steal/betray" is accepted by everyone with a healthy sense of justice, then all people who still commit fraud act against their own conviction.

This leads to guilt. Guilt leads to suppression/ignorance of responsibility. As you know already the "why" it seems obsolete to give a reason, because the reason is obvious, no?

When a person - not mentally ill - sits in front of me and I sense that he/she HAS the sense of the law, I could ask: "Is it possible, that you partly acted against your own conviction and if yes, how do you feel about it?"

... could write a lot more, but will leave it as it is :)

Your topics always leave me with more thoughts.