You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: The Dunning–Kruger Effect: A Case Study

in #psychology6 years ago (edited)

What do you think? He was actually of high IQ (145>) but was trolling for reaction like "you're an idiot " instead he was confronted with someone approaching his statement from a position of ambivalence and he attempted to troll you by those clever deflections from your statement clarifying that irony is what irony does, and he was trolling actually for a negative emotional reaction the whole time because his objective, despite High IQ was motivated by his salary?

I'm asking rhetorically and strictly calling him an imbecilic dumbass or stoopid^2.