I do believe that community account @steemitbloggers is not doing any sort of that thing but who likes to do the dirty work directly, obviously it is carried out indirectly by henchmen/sidekicks whether influenced by top chain or not.
@freecrypto
No matter, how much you rephrase it with, its going to remain the same, even reward word is not going to cut it. @partiko and you are offering rewards to influence big picture, so in that case @steemchurch is better in that scenario.
But yes, ideally no one wants to be approached for these kind of purpose but your fact applies on it, if @crypo.piotr is approaching people via wallet memos then they can simply ignore whatever he is saying just like you said, its their own choice.
@quillfire
Let's me get it very straight that I understand that everything can become fair in Love and War and I believe you already understand that but my point is claiming to do something but actually do the opposite is an act of Hypocrisy.
I am not exactly sure how that matter related to @freecrypto is resolved because you must have seen by now that he is defending it, seems like you guys don't have consensus on that
I see you are defending @zord189's intention then I should not think bad about offer of @partiko because they have wrapped it very nicely just like your poetic words.
Do tell me, what can I buy with 0.002/0.001 steem worth memos? NOTHING. That is also a mean of sending message on steem blockchain publicly.
Common sense matters.
People can just ignore @crypto.piotr's wallet memos and move on.
In that event, where's the damage?
By I do have one question for you:
@cryto.piotr is sending large number of people wallet messages. I don't ideally want to be approached like that, even If he sends me then I would simply ignore his request but how is that different from @jaynie sending private DMs in discord.
Additionally, her account got blocked last time for the same reason, How is that not SPAM? or you want to consider @jaynie's attempt to be gas spending and @crypto.piotr's SPAM.
She even tweeted this by somehow in her mind making a point that sending public wallet memo are more bad than her shady/private DMs to all the Steemians.
How Ironic and these are double standards I would say.
Ideally, I hate both type of spam but I consider both @jaynie and @crypto.piotr to be the exactly same in this and if I have to choose better option. I would go with public memos because that is more transparent and everybody know what that person is doing and his/her intentions. I could not never know what approach or deals @jaynie might cut privately in DMs but in scenarios like these I prefer more transparency. Again, not an ideal scenario but this is act during times of War.
I would personally give credit to @crypto.piotr for mentioning in his post that he did approached you guys first, whatever happened he's got +1 on your guys for more transparency.
Hi again,
Again, from my point of view, I'm not running a commentary on what other campaigns are doing. I just don't know what they are doing and I don't really care what they do. My post was only about the way we are aiming to run our campaign.
As far as I know, @freecrypto is removing his offer. It was well intended, but came across wrong. I personally don't agree with it.
Anyway, I see you have a bee in your bonnet about this... It appears we see things in a different light, which is fine. I guess there is nothing that I can say that will convince you that we are trying to run a decent campaign, but I can see that if you came to it with a certain idea and narrative in mind then the title might lead you to thinking it was a post with an agenda. However, it isn't... Again, I can't convince you with hard proof one way or another about my intent...
Hi @xpose,
I will not get into a mud slinging commentary with you or anyone else but will say this. The people I dm'd were members of OUR COMMUNITY, mostly reminding them to get to the poll to vote and other people that I know well, simply asking if they would support us - HARDLY shady activity lol. I got blocked for the volume of DM's sadly... and NO deals were struck by me - none whatsoever!! Somewhat different to the manner in which you have chosen to portray my actions. But, I know how I handled myself both in the previous poll and this one - and I have nothing further to justify... simple as that.
You are entitled to your opinions and perceptions, but the wonderful thing about NOT doing anything dodgy is that you don't have anything to hide.
I need to have my focus on the positives of this poll and will no longer engage in this convo. It is a fruitless conversation and my energy is better spent elsewhere.
I also know "how" I was approached by certain individuals mentioned here and because of the TRANSPARENCY which I requested and was denied... I declined to get involved. And I am glad I did.
All the best to all parties as we head to the finish line - irrespective of details.
Ciao ;)
Hi @jaynie
I don't care if you reply back or not, it does not matter.
It is known fact that only YOUR community is doing cheap stunts of mud slinging in their posts, am sure you already knew that including you. I have not find any other community doing it even indirectly but you can't even admit it.
Yes, I am allowed to have my opinions and I don't have to remind you how you got yourself in trouble when you mentioned word 'Secular' last time and why I can only sense your Vendetta against @steemchurch only maybe you are biased in that approach because you are Agnostic by nature. It is none of my concern but your actions indirectly do seem to be Anti-religious, maybe its your hatred for it and you can't confront it openly. You are allowed to have your own agenda but running a campaign on that, NOT VERY GOOD.
If you can't admit even your own actions then you should stop taking digs for the same thing at others.
Hopefully, it full be last of my reply because I do wanted public to know more about this.
May the best community wins, so far I consider @homesteaderscoop to be more fair but who really cares about being fair.
@xpose
You said I'm defending it , yup for sure why not? Please tell me any reason?
Hey brother or sister whoever behind this account running I wanted to say that you didn't even understand my twitter post too.
You are making false allegations by saying that I'm bribing , I clearly mentioned that I will send 0.5 Steem as a reward please first understand the words 🙏🙏.
And let me tell you asking someone help and giving them the reward in return is not wrong, first of all we or I are not forcing anyone to go and upvote to the selected person . Do you even watched or read the post before typing your words 🙏.
I don't know about the others but atleast @steemitbloggers is not forcing anyone to upvote them
Yeah they are asking to help from their community members and it's not wrong because they are helping to everyone in their community.
And everyone has a freedom to choose, freedom to support so it's our freedom to support anyone in any way and make sure sending 0.5 Steem for getting support in return is atleast not harming to anyone.
But your false allegations is harming to everyone 🙏🙏.
Posted using Partiko Android