It appears that the defendants in the DNC Fraud Lawsuit are attempting to argue that cheating a candidate in the primary process is protected under the first amendment.

Well, isn't that special!

It seems here that the DNC is arguing for its right to appoint candidates at its own discretion while simultaneously denying any "fiduciary duty" to represent the voters who donated to the Democratic Party under the belief that the DNC would act impartially towards the candidates involved.

IN a certain way, it makes sense. That denial allows the DNC to switch back to the old way of appointing candidates. Looks to me like they're asserting a right that they're keeping in reserve.