The "powers that be" want us to be polarized. We are easier to control if we view the enemies among us as the ones we need to stand up against. In some ways this is rich vs poor. Haves vs have not's, but in general it is the puppet masters. The very rich, that decide how the media portrays things, how the politicians act. They do this with cunning and precision as this is old money that controls these systems. It will require grass root effort, and the masses will have to start thinking for themselves. Most of us sit in the middle ground, and the right and the left are drifting farther and farther apart.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
See my response to @lennstar for my views on the Rich vs Poor. I view that as more misdirection. It is a small minority of rich people that this applies to. Yet them being RICH is not what makes them who they are. The fact they do what they do over time does grow their wealth, as well as their power in other areas. Yet the rich vs poor I view largely as more misdirection and divisionary tactics,
When I say rich I don't mean normal millionaires and people who just have more. This is institutional money. We are talking about the richest families and institutions of our country and world. Most people say rich vs poor, but you are right. The amount of money someone has says nothing of their character. So we don't refer to all rich people, or even all very wealthy people. But the facts remain. Money is power, and those that would choose to use their money to influence nations can and do that with great affect.
Yes they do. They also get smart and tie it up in non-liquid assets as well that they can use to influence and survive through any political or monetary storms.
Those in power will obviously gain great wealth. The longer they stay in power the more this is true.
My main concern is that there is a bit too much of an emphasis of RICH vs POOR, or even the 1% type movement, when let's face it these people we are talking about are not truly the 1%. They are more like the 0.001%.
So that means the 1% movement has anger being targeted at a lot of people who are not the bad guys. They are the scapegoats and puppets just like the poor people being aimed at them.
I really see no different between that division and the division over race and religion.
You can see the ones who are actually the puppet masters if you look. They persist across generations, and are present as influencers regardless of who is in power in the governments, and even regardless of what type of government it is.
They view the world much like a chessboard and everyone is simply pieces in their game, while they don't view themselves as a PIECE but as the player.
I agree completely with your 1% analogy. Many of these top 1% I'm sure are very nice people that do lots of good things. So to say rich vs poor is incorrect, and probably only serves to divide us more. You are right on that.
"You can see the ones who are actually the puppet masters if you look. They persist across generations, and are present as influencers regardless of who is in power in the governments, and even regardless of what type of government it is."
This is the truth here, well said.
This is a total lie. You never see true power. Ever. Above those who you see, lies the black nobility. And above them, lies the god of this world, their master.
All the world is a stage.. black and white is duality. Look at your friendly masonic lodge to see who enjoys a chessboard floor.