Extreme adherence to the axiomatic and immutable, objective reality of nature-conferred individual self-ownership cannot, by very definition, produce those unsavory results you've listed.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Extreme adherence to the axiomatic and immutable, objective reality of nature-conferred individual self-ownership cannot, by very definition, produce those unsavory results you've listed.
Not according to how you interpret those words, maybe, but at what point does your self-ownership interfere with mine? And at that point, whose self-ownership is more important? The murderer of Jo Cox clearly felt that his right to self-ownership was sufficient to justify murder...