You know that a society has reached its bitter end, when the citizens compare and contrast presidential candidates by arguing which one of them is "worse," as opposed to which one of them is "better." If they critiqued their future masters in regard to their positive qualities, then not only would there be nothing to argue about, the people would start asking themselves why the hell they need a ruler in the first place.
You don't seem to understand that if I can speak for people who aren't anarchists, we don't view Obama as our 'master.' We view him as an elected official elected to make certain descisions within a specific framework.
Like Hitler?