I have just a few questions you may want to help with:
Are there any buddhist terrorists that kill in the name of Buddha?
Are there any christian terrorists that kill in the name of Jesus?
What's the percentage of muslim comunities that actually condemn these act of terrorism?
Why are they now "no-entry" zones in cities of Europe that just a few years ago were completely accessible?
Why are police afraid of entering muslim neighborhoods, like in London, Paris( les Banlieues), Stockholm?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Are you joking? Do you not see what Christians do to others?
You do realize they're only no-entry for police, and even then it's questionably no-entry at best. That's not a refugee problem, that's an anti-state thing.
Why are the police in athens fucking terrified of entering into the communist/anarchist neighborhoods?
Why are they afraid of many black neighborhoods in America?
Because there their badge and outfit that screams "I catch bullets for the state(!)" represents nothing but a target, and rightfully goddamn so.
My questions are, are these questions political or religious? There are many political groups which happen to be Muslim, Christian, Buddhist, which have done terrorist attacks.
Does the religion have anything to do with the political agendas or is religion used to brainwash people into supporting certain political agendas?
Usually you reply to questions with answers , not with other questions!!!
But i'm just a level 33 user, so I better stay quiet.
Hey man , i have answers for your questions , this is the typical un-educated question i get asked alot ... Yes there are Buddist that kill in the name of Budha heres a link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhism_and_violence
And yes there are Christians that kill in the name of jesus Africa has Anti-balaka they destroy mosques and kill muslims , another one is Tripura in india a terrorist group that go around killing anyone that opposes there religion. I could go on and on but you better do your research before asking such questions... I don't blame you for not hearing about those as Media is owned by goverments and political parties and all have agendas , so By them shedding the light on Isis they empower them give them a platform and make the stronger.Muslim communities that condemn terrorism ??? You would be surprised buddy ... Only 99 % of muslim countries condemn it, Come to Dubai ,Oman, Egypt , No one likes to see innocent people being killed muslim or not.
Man and the rest of the questions go back to my answer of AGENDAS of governments of ruining the image of islam read my other reply on this post and get a grip .
I thought we were talking of Europe and the western world. Since the title is "Are immigrants more likely to become terrorists?"
and where do immigrants come from wise one ? Jupiter or Mars ? Immigrants are people , and like people there is good and there is bad. an immigrant , a friend of my cousin in the U.S was shot with his wife in their home because of their religion ... The media said the man that killed them was sick in the head, anything to keep the word terrorist associated with muslims and ONLY muslims.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2015_Chapel_Hill_shooting
And who said that? I'm just saying you can't deny that in Europe , 2015 to 2017, almost all the attacks are done by people of the same religion.
99.9999% of muslims dont associate themselves with those terrorists so you can't say same religion , ISIS are not muslims and i find it offensive that they are called muslims they're animals
I was a immigrant, now I live happily in California....
And this is typical patronizing arrogance.
You'd better speak your mind, as you just did. Staying quiet is the worst option.
The Holy inquisition in 9-12 centures could kill thousands in the name of Christ. Islam is the youngest among Christianity Buddhism and Judaism. It can explain, but not justify Islamic extremism.
Police can afraid to enter dangerous areas not only because of the religion of its inhabitants - eg. Latin districts in California or Christiania in Denmark.
This is the most stupid argument I can think of. And also the most dangerous one: appealing to collective responsibility and trying to invoke collective guilt. Quite a lot of people have been killed due to this kind of thinking. It's easy to start, and hard to stop.
It is not the argument, it is example. Question was did the christians kill in the name of Christ - yes, they did. Can it justify islamic terror - no, just can explain terror motivation from evolution point of view
No, the question was: "Are there any christian terrorists that kill in the name of Jesus?". Present tense, not past.
How does inquisition explain terror motivation from evolution point of view? Please elaborate.
Christianity at certain stages tried to spread its influence using force and terror. The Inquisition is an example of this stage - Crusades, struggle against heretics, conquistadors. Islam is the youngest religion of the above mentioned, so a propensity for terror can be part of its evolution, but not its essence.
Perfect. Let's continue your explanation. I'll give you one more example - it involves the white man being guilty, so you should be pleased.
Europeans arriving to America in the 16th & 17th century and wiping out the natives almost entirely (mostly due to diseases that they brought). And a similar story for Australia.
What's the conclusion of all those examples (both yours and mine)? It's this: things like religion or immigration can go horribly wrong. The unknown can sometimes be beneficial but sometimes it can be disastrous. People have evolved to be afraid. And fear plays an important role: those who were not afraid enough did not survive.
During the Inquisition - did the Muslim people set out immigration polices and invite the Europeans to live among them? I guess they were wise enough not to do that. They were scared and it was for a good reason.
So why are you so eager to "explain" one side of the story and dismiss the other? Why don't you explain the validity of fear of foreigners? Instead of shaming those who feel it and dismissing them as uneducated bigots.
Well, it is not a pleasure for me to blame any man for anything just because of his religion or color differ ( including whites and cristians). And I dont consider any scared person to be uneducated bigot. But this approach when any foreign muslim is concidered to be potential terrorist really humper to the process of naturalisation / assimilation. You ask why I dont want explain the right to fear - because in my humble opinion, fear can help someone to survive, but can not solve his problem.
Why did the crusades happen? Have you ever thought about that? Or have you just decided in your own mind it was the evil white man who all of a sudden decided he was going to go out and slaughter arabs? Europe had been under siege by Islam for 500 years. Islam had taken over most of Italy, Spain, half of France and was knocking on the doors of Vienna. (The gates of Vienna) Europeans had been watching this take over silencly, not retaliating. Now they had had enough. Arabs were taking hundreds of thousands of european slaves to brutal living conditions in foreign countries. If you look at the number of battles initiated by arabs throughout the centuries vs the crusades, the crusades account for very little of the battles in this era. Youtube "why we are afraid" and watch the lecture.
not 2 mention the war that has claimed millions of Muslims......since 2001