Pelosi: “I Don’t See Anything Inappropriate” In Rigging Primaries

in #politics7 years ago (edited)

The Intercept has published a secretly taped audio recording of one of the most powerful Democrats in America pressuring a progressive candidate to drop out of a Colorado congressional primary race. It hasn't been getting as much attention as the WikiLeaks drops on the DNC's sabotage of the Sanders campaign because it's not about a presidential race, but make no mistake: this is the single most damning piece of evidence ever published exposing the Democratic Party's war on progressives.

The recording features House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer, the second-highest ranking Democrat in the House of Representatives, informing primary challenger Levi Tillemann that if he runs, he will be running against not just the chosen establishment candidate Jason Crow, but against Hoyer and the full might of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) as well.

"Which means effectively, Congressman Hoyer," Tillemann is heard saying toward the end of the recording, "I’m running a campaign against Crow, and against you, and against the DCCC, because you guys are on Crow’s side."

"Yeah," replied Hoyer. "You know, frankly, that happens in life all the time."

Here is a full transcript of the published recording:

HOYER: Levi, obviously I wanted to talk to you about this congressional race.

TILLEMANN: You would like me to get out of the race.

HOYER: You keep saying I would like you to get out, and of course that’s correct.

TILLEMANN: I know you’re fundraising for Crow.

HOYER: Yeah. I’m for Crow. I am for Crow because a judgment was made very early on. I didn’t participate in the decision.

TILLEMANN: So your position is a decision was made very early on before voters had a say. That’s fine because the DCCC knows better than the voters of the Sixth Congressional District, and we should line up behind that candidate.

HOYER: That’s certainly a consequence of our decision. There are two things I would like you to consider. One may be easier than the other. First would be, if you stay in the race — and frankly, I hope that you would not — but I’ll get to that in a second. But if you stay in the race, it is not useful to the objective to tear down Crow. Crow’s clearly the favorite; doesn’t mean he’ll win, just means he’s the favorite.

TILLEMANN: I hear you.

HOYER: That doesn’t mean it’s right, just means —

TILLEMANN: No, I hear you.

HOYER: I don’t know Crow well, but I think he’s a decent human being.

TILLEMANN: So before we go any further on that, Crow is the favorite in no small part, Congressman Hoyer, because the DCCC not only put its finger on the scale, but started jumping on the scale very early on. I’m born and raised a Democrat, I mean, it’s undemocratic to have a small elite select someone and then try to rig the primary against the other people running, and that’s basically what’s been happening.

HOYER: I hear you, and I disagree.

TILLEMANN: But you were part of that process.

HOYER: Absolutely.

TILLEMANN: You said, “Abso —”?

Hoyer: Absolutely.

TILLEMANN: Yes.

HOYER: I’ve been at this a long time. When I said we need to get in strong, hard, and early, you disagree with me. You know, obviously, that’s your choice.

TILLEMANN: You guys are shoveling money at him.

HOYER: We’re going to continue.

TILLEMANN: You’re going to continue to do it?

HOYER: We are going to continue to do it, and the reason, Levi, we’re going to do it is because a decision was made to focus. It was clear that was our policy and our hope that we could, early on, try to come to an agreement on a candidate that we thought could win the general, and to give that candidate all the help we could give them so that we would have a unified effort going into a general election.

TILLEMANN: Which means effectively, Congressman Hoyer, I’m running a campaign against Crow, and against you, and against the DCCC, because you guys are on Crow’s side.

HOYER: Yeah. You know, frankly, that happens in life all the time.

So there you have it. It simply doesn't get any more incriminating than a published recording of a top Democrat informing a progressive candidate that the party will be placing its thumb on the scale against his primary opponent if he doesn't drop out.

Or at least, that's what I would have thought.

Nancy Pelosi, the only House Democrat who outranks Hoyer, somehow surpassed the jaw-dropping revelations in the audio recording by giving Hoyer's actions her full-throated endorsement.

“I don’t know that a person can tape a person without the person’s consent and then release it to the press,” Pelosi told reporters today. “In terms of candidates and campaigns I don’t see anything inappropriate in what Mr. Hoyer was engaged in — a conversation about the realities of life in the race as to who can make the general election.

That's right, instead of blaming this evidence on Russian hackers, Democratic Party leadership has opted to try a brand new approach: they're openly admitting to knowingly rigging their primaries against progressive candidates and saying that it's the right thing to do. Because that's how you win general elections.

So to recap, the leadership of the Democratic party is no longer attempting to hide the fact that it deliberately stacks its own primaries against progressive candidates, and yet still has the gall to act like they're the smart adults in the room who know how to win general elections. These are the same people who think telling the public "screw primaries, you'll vote how we say" is sheer strategic brilliance. The same people who lost over a thousand seats under Obama.

The leaders of the Democratic Party may be experts at defeating progressive primary challengers, but they don't know how to win general elections. Winning general elections is not their concern. Last year we saw resort tycoon Stephen Cloobeck openly boast on national television that he had instructed Pelosi and other Dem leaders to espouse a pro-billionaire platform or else risk losing plutocratic funding, and this is exactly what we are seeing them do. The Democratic Party doesn't care about winning elections, it cares about making sure the oligarchs who own it are able to continue ruling over the deliberately impoverished and politically impotent masses. That is its job. That is its function.

Since power is relative and America has a system wherein money translates directly into political power, a plutocratic class has emerged which is naturally incentivized to keep the rest of America as poor as possible in order to rule like kings. That plutocratic class wields immense political influence over both parties with legalized bribery in the form of campaign contributions and corporate lobbying, while the deliberately impoverished majority of Americans have no influence whatsoever over US policy and behavior, regardless of how they vote.

These plutocrats don't care who wins. They are not buying out races because they care which horse comes out in front. They only care that both horses serve them.

Americans are manipulated into supporting this extortion scheme of corporatist oligarchy by a plutocrat-owned media propaganda system which uses fear and divisiveness to herd them into one of two plutocrat-owned mainstream parties, both of which place the interests of their corporate owners over the interests of the people, and even over winning. Progressives have been successfully corralled into the donkey party by using the carrot of someday-maybe-hopefully having sorta-kinda economic justice and the stick of "But Trump!", but the donkey party is the elephant party with a different mascot and different bumper stickers.

This clearly is not working. The Democratic Party has locked the door on human interests, bolted it shut, and is now admitting it openly. At least when they were trying to hide it they could be pressured to allowing progressive candidates something loosely resembling a fair shot at election, but now they're just saying "No, progressives are the enemy. Out." So they can't even be pressured to pretend that they have real primaries.

The Democrats are officially an over-funded novelty joke party with a humorously ironic novelty joke name. They are useless. They are worthless. Time for something new.


Internet censorship is getting pretty bad, so best way to keep seeing my daily articles is to get on the mailing list for my website, so you'll get an email notification for everything I publish. My articles and podcasts are entirely reader and listener-funded, so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, liking me on Facebook, following my antics on Twitter, checking out my podcast, throwing some money into my hat on Patreon or Paypal, or buying my new book Woke: A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers.

Bitcoin donations:1Ac7PCQXoQoLA9Sh8fhAgiU3PHA2EX5Zm2

Sort:  

Of course she doesn't see anything inappropriate. She's slime...

We did it to Bernie , nothing happened to us , what do you expect?

Pelosi " no we don't need to change anything after 2016" Pelosi

Just another reason these people need to be put out of work.

I don't see how you found that to be shocking after what they did to Bernie Sanders. There was collusion alright and it wasn't Trump and the Russians, more like the DNC, Hillary, the media, and our intelligence community.

You ain't seen doing yet. Wait for 20/20, you'll see more buses than a truck crossing at international borders picking up people shuffling them in to vote, you better believe Obama, Holder and the Clintonites will be using every underhanded dirty trick in the book digging through the garbage to disparage anybody who dares get in their way.

"Time for something new." Yes,we've been saying this for a long time now,yet nothing happens.Bernie could have started "something new" yet he chose to prop up this criminal organization.Who's gonna lead the real political revolution?

Hopefully she doesn't find anything inappropriate in going to jail

thank you for the information.

She's a high class corporate call girl.