I can't argue with how you feel? By that logic, then you can't argue with how anyone feels! And by further logical extension, my commentary is only incendiary -- a quite ludicrous descriptor -- to YOU!

I'll reiterate that I don't care that you disagree with me. What irritates me is your lack of conviction. If you want to come at me, then come at me. I respect that, irrespective of differences of opinion.

What I do not respect is your hedged commentary, where you attack me while calling me a friend. Like I said, just attack me. I respected you for your original comment (outside of the "my friend" business).

Your second post is where I lost a measure of respect, first with the reiteration of "my friend" nonsense, and patronizing me with your "honest discussion" diatribe (particularly as YOU are the one calling me out).

Finally, I don't believe that inclusion and tolerance is sacrosanct, as who we are asked to include, and what we are asked to tolerate, are increasingly antithetical to conservative principles. Perhaps THIS is the root of your disagreement with me.

Whatever it is, my real friends know full well my beliefs so none of my commentary is a surprise to them as it apparently was to you.

In full disclosure, my generally conservative outlook is unlikely to change. If you had a different idea of who I am, then be forewarned that you may find my future work to be offensive. However, I will not back down and I will continue to exercise my free speech as I choose.

If that's fine with you, then welcome aboard! If not, I'm sure there are plenty of accounts that suit your ideological tastes ... they outnumber us conservatives, that I'm certain.