This is slightly incoherent? I don't get your point. There are bad pizza dealers so police should be bad also?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
This is slightly incoherent? I don't get your point. There are bad pizza dealers so police should be bad also?
He's saying that, when an institution has a monopoly on the use of force, they eventually or inherently become untouchable, as evidenced by the lack of prosecutions against the majority of LEO's.
He compared it to pizza as an analogy to express the backwards thinking that says we should only have one enforcement organization, instead of competing security services that would hold bad actors accountable.
I think. Right?
Yes
Of course the whole pizza thing is just sarcasm. Pizza is governed mostly by free market economics. Pizza shop owners are subjected to market completion. They must supply a good product or risk going out of business. Police units do not have to give two shits as to whether or not they do a bad job. Most of the time when they do a bad job they only earn themselves a paid vacation. I'm just trying to explain why having monopoly funded through taxation (force) is a terrible burden on any market economy.