Your content is plagairzed, not original. Hopefulkly, honest users will continue to flag it, as it takes away value from this platform.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Your content is plagairzed, not original. Hopefulkly, honest users will continue to flag it, as it takes away value from this platform.
funny, i was thinking the same thing, just without the oxy.
And y eah, its bad, plagarized content, because you stole it mostly from out of date beginners books and videos. Youve figured out that if you steal information so general as to be effectively useless to everyone, you can defend yourself from accusations of plagarism by claiming that what youre writing is so common knowledge that everyone knows it.
Just like the n early identical wording between phil gordons book and your post on the rule of 2 and 4. Lame, stolen garbage
This authors content is not good right. It's full of spelling mistakes and grammar errors. It's clear that the whales upvoting the content either aren't actually reading it or don't care about the quality. Whatever the case, we can't really do anything about it because of the actual whale size and I am afraid of getting maliciously downvoted. Something I am afraid of with this guy's posts is that down the line there could be a situation similar to patent trolling. This person could write enough articles to 'cover ' most of the concepts. Then if anyone new comes in and tries to write better articles on the same topics, the whales will come along and downvote due to 'plagiarising'. If it's the case that the whales are planning this kind of thing then I'm sure this plan would be being worked on all over the platform. I do not think very highly of complexring, kushed or steemed. They seem like absolute scumbags who will twist public opinion in their favour to make more money.
So it's bad, plagiarized content...hummmm, sounds like an oxymoron.
The initial content could be bad already, I don't quite understand how it could be an oxymoron.