Yes Ofcourse how much and do t forget to delegate that amount to this account t where we have been talking about all this time
And the blog was not epic this comment string is
You seem to believe yourself to be logical while you are the opposite if you were logical you would have already considered the points below.
Medium is a web 2.0 blogging site, which can easily track your data to suggest you content, and give automatically generated links to you and they are not constrained by blockchain standards. Even if there were a suggestion function on one of HIVE's interfaces, it would not be able to track if you saw a post or not and would keep suggesting to you the same posts or if they could find a way to track you and which posts you saw, it would be a costly operation to the interface without a benefit to the interface.
Searching for old content on HIVE is not the same as searching for old content on the Web 2.0 website. It is a taxing operation on the nodes and requires you to develop your own code to do that or use a paid service. Which a normal HIVE blogger would not bother to do, just to add some links to their content.
Still, there are users who link to their old content on their recent posts, if you so wish to read them, so your point just becomes moot, as blogger just needs to include what medium automatically does to their posts manually.
HIVE does not need to feed you with reading content like web 2.0 websites, being fed continuous content does not make a system superior. Web 2.0 websites have to show you more content because that is what their revenue systems need, if you are not shown more content then there is no revenue for them.
HIVE does not have revenue and does not need revenue hence it does not need to show more content to you. It does not need you to consume content for the sake of consumption unlike Web 2.0.
In Web 2.0 consumer is the product, not the content, here the content is the product, not the consumer.
PeakD, hive.blog, and leofinance etc. are all interfaces for the same blockchain, and you are free to develop your own interface with the features you want, there is nothing stopping you. That is why WEB 3.0 is superior to WEB 2.0.
IF some menial links are the price for some entity to not track me, so be it. I don't need some algorithm to suggest me links, I am a big boy I can find content to read on my own.
You can create your own feed by following content creators, better yet you can follow tags. Not being familiar with the features of the interface or the platform is not an excuse to call it inferior.
Consuming content and traffic does not equal growth on Hive. That is your fundamental error. A user who does not anything but reads on Hive is essentially adding no value to the platform.
Yes Ofcourse how much and do t forget to delegate that amount to this account t where we have been talking about all this time
And the blog was not epic this comment string is
You seem to believe yourself to be logical while you are the opposite if you were logical you would have already considered the points below.
Medium is a web 2.0 blogging site, which can easily track your data to suggest you content, and give automatically generated links to you and they are not constrained by blockchain standards. Even if there were a suggestion function on one of HIVE's interfaces, it would not be able to track if you saw a post or not and would keep suggesting to you the same posts or if they could find a way to track you and which posts you saw, it would be a costly operation to the interface without a benefit to the interface.
Searching for old content on HIVE is not the same as searching for old content on the Web 2.0 website. It is a taxing operation on the nodes and requires you to develop your own code to do that or use a paid service. Which a normal HIVE blogger would not bother to do, just to add some links to their content.
Still, there are users who link to their old content on their recent posts, if you so wish to read them, so your point just becomes moot, as blogger just needs to include what medium automatically does to their posts manually.
HIVE does not need to feed you with reading content like web 2.0 websites, being fed continuous content does not make a system superior. Web 2.0 websites have to show you more content because that is what their revenue systems need, if you are not shown more content then there is no revenue for them.
HIVE does not have revenue and does not need revenue hence it does not need to show more content to you. It does not need you to consume content for the sake of consumption unlike Web 2.0.
In Web 2.0 consumer is the product, not the content, here the content is the product, not the consumer.
PeakD, hive.blog, and leofinance etc. are all interfaces for the same blockchain, and you are free to develop your own interface with the features you want, there is nothing stopping you. That is why WEB 3.0 is superior to WEB 2.0.
IF some menial links are the price for some entity to not track me, so be it. I don't need some algorithm to suggest me links, I am a big boy I can find content to read on my own.
You can create your own feed by following content creators, better yet you can follow tags. Not being familiar with the features of the interface or the platform is not an excuse to call it inferior.
Consuming content and traffic does not equal growth on Hive. That is your fundamental error. A user who does not anything but reads on Hive is essentially adding no value to the platform.