Downvoted because you used Ned'd name in your tittle in a negative way trying to get attention(?). This title in my opinion gives not value to steemit...
I totally agree with @dana-edwards
This post has the title: "Ned's pre mined SP is being used to promote Steem abuse!", which makes it seem like some giant conspiracy with Ned involved. I have a problem with the tactics being used because it's the sort of tactics to destroy a community rather than grow it.
Do you know why this post is receiving so much attention? Because surpassinggoogle resteemed it. You should ask that to him why he is giving me so much attention.
In other words, you didn't like my views so you used your higher SP to try and suppress my views. And you succeeded to some extent by sinking it to 24 cents. But look what happened ...
There appears to be two sides right now in steemit. One supports steem price growth. The other supports user growth at the cost of price loss of steem. I am with the first group. I want steem price to go up. But bots that vote on anything regardless of quality are going against this interest. But big investors also support my interest cause it is also their interest.
Why do you think @tamim and @transisto are powering down?
Is anyone that disagrees on that? I don't think so.
It's just what I said about the title... constructive criticism don't disturb me.