Well here is another example of the false accusation: https://steemit.com/copy-paste/@cmoljoe/making-money-with-copy-paste-articles-from-member-with-72-reputation-should-everybody-do-that-2017918t17464558z

Somehow if I write long articles with references, I can't possibly be writing it myself according to that person, and if I write short articles with references, then I can't possibly be writing it myself, so according to that person no matter how long or short, it's "draining the reward pool.". If you look at the date, this person did not contact me for months and blogged about me in secret until this month.

The point I'm revealing is you can be accused of stuff with no evidence, by a person who never read your blog, by a person who just discovered Steem a few months earlier and who barely posts, yet it can still create a big conspiracy.

In my case there is no conspiracy, I'm still posting now only with less rewards. For that reason I see this title with Neds name in it and I think this is perhaps something more than just trying to stop plagiarism on Steemit else why bring Ned into it at all?

I consider you a neutral observer which is why I ask you to review the big picture and tell me what you think.