" you should know what it is(you clearly don't and it isnt what you want it to be)"
I'm sure it's whatever you want it to be.
Also nothing you just said disproves my point in any way. It doesn't matter if "pizzagate was painted retroactively as a right-wing conspiracy theory." It is now doing what I claimed. QAnon succeeded.
"I see one of your last posts on hive.blog is about Tucker Carlson."
If you'd actually watched it you'd realize it was not complementary to Tucker.
Ok, so we cant talk about anything that is latched onto by a specific conspiracy theory group (psychological operation IMO)
As i wrote in my article:
"What…….we arn’’t allowed to deal with a pervasive child porn problem on one of the world’s largest platforms because…?!…a specific conspiracy theory revolves around child sex trafficking? That is taboo?! So we have to pretend something doesn’t exist, when it ostensibly does? What is more dangerous, talking about child sex trafficking, or pretending the buying and selling of human beings only happens far removed from institutions of power?"
Sorry, but even though the narrative managers LOVE how youve responded to the psyop with the intended polarization effect, it doesnt change all the evidence of pizzagate, and there being something to the overall investigation IMO. but sure, bury your head in the sand and slander the theory because you're too lazy to actually think for yourself and prefer to fall into logical fallacies like strawmanning and guilty by association(which is by design)
